Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CGMA) · Fundamentals of Ethics, Corporate Governance and Business Law
CIMA BA4 General principles of the legal system, contract and employment law: practice questions with answers
6 free exam-style questions on General principles of the legal system, contract and employment law for CIMA BA4 Fundamentals of Ethics, Corporate Governance and Business Law. Try each one, then open the answer to read the explanation. Fincora has 52 original questions on this syllabus area.
Question 1
Which of the following is characteristic of a civil (codified) law system, such as that of France, rather than a common law system such as that of England?
- A Much of the law is made by judges through a system of binding judicial precedent, with codes playing a minor role
- B The law is based mainly on local customs that have never been written down
- C The law is set out mainly in written codes, and judges are not bound by earlier court decisions
- D All civil disputes are decided by juries of ordinary citizens rather than by professional judges
Show the answer
Answer: C. Civil law systems (much of continental Europe, Latin America and parts of Asia and Africa) derive from Roman law. Their law is set out in comprehensive written codes (for example France's Civil Code); judges interpret and apply the code, and previous decisions are persuasive rather than binding. Procedure tends to be inquisitorial. Common law systems (England and Wales, the US and many Commonwealth countries) give a central role to judge-made law and binding precedent, alongside legislation, with an adversarial procedure.
Question 2
Under the English doctrine of judicial precedent, which part of an earlier judgment is binding on lower courts in later cases with similar material facts?
- A The obiter dicta: comments made 'by the way' that were not necessary for the decision
- B The dissenting judgment of a judge in the minority
- C The ratio decidendi: the legal reasoning necessary for the decision
- D The arguments put forward by the barristers for each party
Show the answer
Answer: C. Under stare decisis (let the decision stand), courts must follow decisions of higher courts (and in some cases their own earlier decisions) on the same point of law. Only the ratio decidendi, the legal principle or reasoning necessary to reach the decision on the material facts, is binding. Obiter dicta, statements of law not necessary for the decision, and dissenting judgments are persuasive only. A precedent can be avoided by distinguishing the material facts, or overruled by a higher court.
Question 3
Sasha does work for Pellow Co. Which of the following factors most strongly indicates that she is an employee rather than an independent contractor?
- A She provides her own expensive equipment and pays for any helpers she hires
- B She invoices Pellow for each job and is free to work for other clients
- C Pellow decides how, when and where she does the work, and she must do it personally
- D She bears the financial risk if a job takes longer than she estimated
Show the answer
Answer: C. The courts use several tests to decide whether a person is an employee (contract of service) or an independent contractor (contract for services):
- Control test – does the employer control what is done and how, when and where?
- Integration test – is the person an integral part of the organisation?
- Economic reality (multiple) test – considering all factors, including personal service, mutuality of obligation, who provides equipment, who takes the financial risk and opportunity for profit, and how the arrangement is described.
Strong control and the requirement to work personally indicate employment. The distinction matters for employment rights, vicarious liability and tax.
Question 4
A contract that appears to be valid, but which one of the parties is entitled to set aside, for example because it was induced by misrepresentation, is described as:
- A Voidable
- B Void
- C Unenforceable
- D Discharged
Show the answer
Answer: A. Agreements that lack one of the essentials of a valid contract may be:
- Void: of no legal effect from the start, so neither party can enforce it (for example, a contract to commit a crime).
- Voidable: valid, but one party has the right to set it aside, for example where that party was induced to enter it by misrepresentation or duress. Until it is avoided, it remains binding.
- Unenforceable: valid, but the courts will not enforce it, for example because a required form of written evidence is missing.
A contract is discharged when the obligations under it come to an end.
Question 5
Which of the following remedies may be awarded for unfair dismissal, but is NOT available in a claim for wrongful dismissal?
- A An order for re-engagement of the employee in comparable employment with the employer
- B Compensation for the employee's loss of earnings caused by the dismissal
- C Damages equal to the pay the employee would have earned during the notice period
- D An order of specific performance requiring the employer to keep employing the employee
Show the answer
Answer: A. Wrongful dismissal is a common law claim for breach of contract, usually dismissal without proper notice. The remedy is damages, normally the pay and benefits the employee would have received during the notice period, less any amounts earned in mitigation. The courts will not order an employer to continue employing someone (no specific performance).
Unfair dismissal is a statutory claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996, heard by an employment tribunal. Its remedies are:
- reinstatement (the employee returns to the same job, treated as if never dismissed);
- re-engagement (employment in a comparable or other suitable job with the employer or an associated employer); and
- compensation (a basic award and a compensatory award).
So re-engagement is available only for unfair dismissal.
Question 6
Which statement correctly describes a difference between criminal law and civil law in England?
- A In a criminal case the claimant must prove the case on the balance of probabilities, whereas in a civil case liability must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
- B In a criminal case guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, whereas in a civil case the claimant must prove the case on the balance of probabilities
- C Criminal cases are normally brought by private individuals, whereas civil cases are normally brought by the state
- D Criminal law deals mainly with disputes over contracts, whereas civil law deals with offences against society
Show the answer
Answer: B. Criminal law deals with conduct regarded as a wrong against society. Cases are normally brought by the state (in England, usually the Crown Prosecution Service) against the defendant, who must be proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Punishments include fines and imprisonment.
Civil law deals with disputes between private parties, such as contract, tort and employment. The claimant sues the defendant and must prove the case on the balance of probabilities. The usual remedy is compensation (damages) or an equitable remedy.
Keep practising General principles of the legal system, contract and employment law
Sign up free to practise this syllabus area in full, sit timed CIMA BA4 mocks and see your score by area. Every question on Fincora is written by us; none are past exam papers.
More CIMA BA4 syllabus areas
Practice questions are for study only and are not official exam questions. Back to CIMA BA4 mock exams and practice.